Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZc21Fb+wuF2p6Zib4MzPQqsKJtjUr9cdjqDfHp7yNJoQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with logical replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: >> To me, it seems like SnapBuildWaitSnapshot() is fundamentally >> misdesigned > > Maybe I'm confused, but why is it fundamentally misdesigned? It's not > such an absurd idea to wait for an xid in a WAL record. I get that > there's a race condition here, which obviously bad, but I don't really > see as evidence of the above claim. > > I actually think this code used to be safe because ProcArrayLock used to > be held while generating and logging the running snapshots record. That > was removed when fixing some other bug, but perhaps that shouldn't have > been done... OK. Well, I might be overstating the case. My comment about fundamental misdesign was really just based on the assumption that XactLockTableWait() could be used to wait for an XID the instant it was generated. That was never gonna work and there's no obvious clean workaround for the problem. Getting snapshot building to work properly seems to be Hard (TM). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: