Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZbmV+fNpE1omFOnYqrSBQsfSyr9CQtOr7j58VLo0sZAw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors
Re: Incorrectly reporting config errors |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 21 January 2014 18:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> writes: >>> I'm getting a report of a config error when changing a config value >>> that requires a restart: >>> ... >>> 2014-01-21 18:14:53 GMT [28718]: [4-1] user=,db=,client= LOG: >>> received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files >>> 2014-01-21 18:14:53 GMT [28718]: [5-1] user=,db=,client= LOG: >>> parameter "max_connections" cannot be changed without restarting the >>> server >>> 2014-01-21 18:14:53 GMT [28718]: [6-1] user=,db=,client= LOG: >>> configuration file "/home/thom/Development/data/postgresql.conf" >>> contains errors; unaffected changes were applied >> >>> It doesn't contain errors. >> >> Yeah it does: it's got a value that can't be applied. I think you're >> making a semantic quibble. > > I see it as technically wrong. There's nothing wrong with my config > file. A reload of the file may not be able to apply all the settings, > but there's no typo or mistake anywhere in my file. I would just need > to restart instead of reload. > > However, given that you find it unsurprising, I'll leave it there. I kind of agree with Thom. I understand why it's doing what it's doing, but it still seems sort of lame. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: