Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZb2P3=gy+qtpR02GfdsUfJUkDpv2=wz=GF+42oeTerzw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] binary heap implementation (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation
Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation Re: [PATCH] binary heap implementation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Comments? Suggestions? It could use a run through pgindent. And the header comments are separated by a blank line from the functions to which they are attached, which is not project style. + if (heap->size + 1 == heap->space) + Assert("binary heap is full"); This doesn't really make any sense. Assert("binary heap is full") will never fail, because that expression is a character string which is, therefore, not NULL. I think you want Assert(heap->size < heap->space). Or you could use (heap->size + 1 >= heap->space) elog(LEVEL, message) if there's some reason this needs to be checked in non-debug builds. + { + sift_down(heap, i); + } Project style is to omit braces for a single-line body. This comes up a few other places as well. Other than the coding style issues, I think this looks fine. If you can fix that up, I believe I could go ahead and commit this, unless anyone else objects. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: