Re: WIP: Failover Slots
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Failover Slots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZam8QYYsP=u44pQiF+wqMVzWZrTsYWvQ_Okju65SsxxQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WIP: Failover Slots (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Failover Slots
Re: WIP: Failover Slots |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Failover Slots > In the current patch, any slot defined on a master will generate WAL, > leading to a pending-slot being present on all standby nodes. When a standby > is promoted, the slot becomes usable and will have the properties as of the > last fsync on the master. No objection to the concept, but I think the new behavior needs to be optional. I am guessing that you are thinking along similar lines, but it's not explicitly called out here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: