Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZaDAOkNjDOah9-2Z9Zho2G94qggcY6U_hxRp5ATLFGYg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Materialized view assertion failure in HEAD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote: > I want to give everyone else a chance to weigh in before I start > the pendulum swinging back in the other direction on OIDs in MVs. > Opinions? I agree that it's probably better to just disallow this, but I have to admit I don't like your proposed patch much. It seems to me that the right place to fix this is in interpretOidsOption(), by returning false rather than default_with_oids whenever the relation is a materialized view. That would require passing the relkind as an additional argument to interpretOidsOption(), but that doesn't seem problematic. Then, the parser could just error out if OIDS=anything appears in the options list, but it wouldn't need to actually kludge the options list as you've done here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: