Re: Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZXugh77M1tSVYZgSOE9U3TtzvKaCQYGwWYct-K0f0oJQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > The comment seems to have been copied from ATExecAddColumn, which says: > > /* > * If we are told not to recurse, there had better not be any > - * child tables; else the addition would put them out of step. > > For ATExecValidateConstraint, it should say something like: > > + * child tables; else validating the constraint would put them > + * out of step. > > Attached patch fixes it. I agree that the current comment is wrong, but what does "out of step" actually mean here, anyway? I think this isn't very clear. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: