Re: Snapshot too old logging
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Snapshot too old logging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZWk7zm_XqzDyd_2ziWMALWdhuGFnF237tbs444XUTumA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Snapshot too old logging (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Snapshot too old logging
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think it would be better not to include either the snapshot or the >> block number, and just find some way to reword the error message so >> that it mentions which relation was involved without implying that all >> access to the relation would necessarily fail. For example: >> >> ERROR: snapshot too old >> DETAIL: One or more rows required by this query have already been >> removed from "%s". > > That particular language would be misleading. All we know about > the page is that it was modified since the referencing (old) > snapshot was taken. We don't don't know in what way it was > modified, so we must assume that it *might* have been pruned of > rows that the snapshot should still be able to see. Oh, yeah. So maybe "may have already been removed". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: