Re: XML Issue with DTDs
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: XML Issue with DTDs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZWQ=tkeijPmF4d-CQ_4jHo=gw1DnST8Pr_HcPjN0goUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | XML Issue with DTDs (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: XML Issue with DTDs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote: > While looking into ways to implement a XMLSTRIP function which extracts the textual contents of an XML value and de-escapesthem (i.e. > Solving this seems a bit messy, unfortunately. First, I think we need to have some XMLOPTION valuewhich is a superset of all the others - otherwise, dump & restore won't work reliably. That means either allowing DTDsif XMLOPTION is CONTENT, or inventing a third XMLOPTION, say ANY. Or we can just decide that it was a bug that this was ever allowed, and if you upgrade to $FIXEDVERSION you'll need to sanitize your data.This is roughly what we did with encoding checks. > We then need to ensure that combining XML values yields something that is valid according to the most general XMLOPTIONsetting. That means either > > (1) Removing the DTD from all but the first argument to XMLCONCAT, and similarly all but the first value passed to XMLAGG > > or > > (2) Complaining if these values contain a DTD. > > or > > (3) Allowing multiple DTDs in a document if XMLOPTION is, say, ANY. > > I'm not in favour of (3), since clients are unlikely to be able to process such a value. (1) matches how we currently handleXML declarations (<?xml …?>), so I'm slightly in favour of that. I don't like #3, mostly because I don't like XMLOPTION ANY in the first place. Either #1 or #2 sounds OK. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: