Re: logical changeset generation v6.7
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logical changeset generation v6.7 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZV8_=0LO716sNKwPp+dLzbsFXYO=1p1m4NOo8RRemcDg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logical changeset generation v6.7 (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2013-11-28 21:15:18 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> OK, I've committed the patch to adjust the definition of >> IsSystemRelation()/IsSystemClass() and add >> IsCatalogRelation()/IsCatalogClass(). > > Thanks for taking care of this! > >> I kibitzed your decision about >> which function to use in a few places - specifically, I made all of >> the places that cared about allow_system_table_mods uses the IsSystem >> functions, and all the places that cared about invalidation messages >> use the IsCatalog functions. I don't think any of these changes are >> more cosmetic, but I think it may reduce the chance of errors or >> inconsistencies in the face of future changes. > > Agreed. > > Do you think we need to do anything about the > ERROR: cannot remove dependency on schema pg_catalog because it is a system object > thingy? Imo the current state is much more consistent than the earlier > one, but that's still a quite surprising leftover... I don't feel obliged to change it, but I also don't see a reason not to clean it up. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: