Re: asynchronous execution
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: asynchronous execution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZSWnhy=SB3ggQcB6EqKxzbNeNn=EfwARnCS5tyhhBNcw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: asynchronous execution (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, parent pointers are not required in the new design. Thinking of > parent pointers, now it seems the event won't get bubbled up the tree > with the new design. But still, , I think it's possible to switch over > to the other asynchronous tree when some node in the current subtree > is waiting. But I am not sure, will think more on that. The bubbling-up still happens, because each node that made an async request gets a callback with the final response - and if it is itself the recipient of an async request, it can use that callback to respond to that request in turn. This version doesn't bubble up through non-async-aware nodes, but that might be a good thing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: