Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZS32=dKKYhXd6C4OSoQU6t=k_rgXq37oDfuFxsR9-0Dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT
Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:07 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yeah, the frontend error message rework in [1]. That has exactly > the same constraint that it's likely to break other open patches, > so it'd be better to do it after the CF cutoff. I think that doing > that concurrently with Robert's thing shouldn't be too risky, because > it only affects frontend code while his patch should touch only backend. So when *exactly* do we want to land these patches? None of the calendar programs I use support "anywhere on earth" as a time zone, but I think that feature freeze is 8am on Friday on the East coast of the United States. If I commit the PGDLLIMPORT change within a few hours after that time, is that good? Should I try to do it earlier, before we technically hit 8am? Should I do it the night before, last thing before I go to bed on Thursday? Do you care whether your commit or mine goes in first? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: