On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> Among the five patches marked as ready for committer, one is a bug fix
>>> that should be back-patched (ahem). Shouldn't we move on with those
>>> entries first?
>>
>> I think at this point we essentially can just move all entries to the
>> next. Will do that, and note down which patches haven't gotten any real
>> review.
>
> We are close to the end of the month. Should I move on to do the
> vacuuming or are you planning to do it? At this stage, to be fair with
> people whose patches are in "waiting on author" state and because
> there is not much time until the next CF begins, I propose to remove
> all the remaining 43 entries with the same status as currently listed:
> Needs review: 26. Waiting on Author: 11. Ready for Committer: 6.
Gosh, that's a lot of stuff that didn't get reviewed. :-(
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company