Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZQKJPYxWfCBtkk9HG2eAoAf1mp7VXm_8HV4kxjqMShUQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > Attached rebased patch. Committed with a bunch of mostly-cosmetic revisions. I removed the macro you added, which has a multiple evaluation hazard, and just put that logic back into the function. I don't think it's likely to matter for performance, and this way is safer. I removed an inline keyword from another static function as well; better to let the compiler decide what to do. I rearranged a few things to shorten some long lines, too. Aside from that I think all of the changes I made were to comments and documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: