Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZPNJmP7u_ZB3y33nDqgJrekTfVG6CdtnGvSmfoxHZc-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's
benefit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > From the reading the original post it seems like the patch was developed on > Sales Force's time, not TGLs. I do not think we get to have an opinion on > that. Salesforce gets to develop their patches whenever they want, but they don't get to control the community process for getting those patches committed to PostgreSQL. > Thank you Tom for the efforts you made here, making the largest used PL > better, faster, stronger is exactly the type of micro-changes we need to be > looking at for further polish within the database. So, just to be clear, are you proposing that everybody is exempted from the CommitFest deadlines, or just Tom? Thanks, -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: