Re: Parallel Seq Scan
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZOe0v6j8NgTFe48oFMx2LYjWJN=_f8e_QLEa7CEM2HVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel Seq Scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel Seq Scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this can happen if funnel->nextqueue is greater than > funnel->nqueues. > Please see if attached patch fixes the issue, else could you share the > scenario in more detail where you hit this issue. Speaking as the guy who wrote the first version of that code... I don't think this is the right fix; the point of that code is to remove a tuple queue from the funnel when it gets detached, which is a correct thing to want to do. funnel->nextqueue should always be less than funnel->nqueues; how is that failing to be the case here? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: