Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]
<KBaker9@its.jnj.com> wrote:
> My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or writing to the pipe (and associated handling
ofSIGPIPE), it just relied on postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.
 

I'm not following.

> Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would you be the logical choice to implement
thechange?
 
> I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want to step on anyone's toes.

I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but
I may be able to help review.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company