Re: elog() error, trying CURENT OF with foreign table
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog() error, trying CURENT OF with foreign table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZOGynVEy=zyb6-Wi1SdidcdbTFVw_X=8NdKpSdjru-dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elog() error, trying CURENT OF with foreign table (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: elog() error, trying CURENT OF with foreign table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Yeah, that's an unimplemented feature. > >> So, should we just make that an >> ereport(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), ...) instead of >> elog()? > > I'm not that excited about the errcode; if we're going to do anything, > changing the message text seems more important. Perhaps we could have > it say "WHERE CURRENT OF is not supported for this table type"? That's > jumping to conclusions about why the expression didn't get converted, > but at least for this case it'd be a more useful user-facing message. Yeah, it's probably good to improve the error message, too; and that suggestion seems as good as any. But I still think it should be ereport if it's user-facing. My main concern was actually whether we ought to be detecting this earlier in the process, before it gets as far as the executor. I haven't scrutinized the code though so have no particular reason to believe it's not OK as-is. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: