Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZLUGLkE1E8OyF9au03z-CiCwUFR=FTJ7b=57kk_LsoKw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:01 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > That's not responsive to the need that I have. I need users to be able > to figure out which backend(s) are overflowing their snapshots -- and > perhaps how badly and how often --- not which backends are incurring > an expense as a result. There may well be a use case for the latter > thing but it's a different problem. So ... I want to go ahead and commit Dilip's v4 patch, or something very like it. Most people were initially supportive. Tom expressed some opposition, but it sounds like that was mostly to the discussion going on and on rather than the idea per se. Andres also expressed some concerns, but I really think the problem he's worried about is something slightly different and need not block this work. I note also that the v4 patch is designed in such a way that it does not change any view definitions, so the compatibility impact of committing it is basically nil. Any strenuous objections? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: