Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a running backend |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZL18gVSEz8jEFhkq8bQJtqUf24S6LBdrZ6Z4cDZx++gQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a runningbackend (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using ProcSignal to get memory context stats from a runningbackend
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I do wonder if the right thing here wouldn't be to put the result into a > dsm segment, and then return that to the UDF on the requesting > side. Logging to the server log and then have the requestor dig that out > doesn't seem particularly user friendly. I think that dumping it to the server log will be fine for most people, and it's *significantly* safer. Creating a DSM segment could fail, and the last thing we want is for interrogating a long-running backend to make it crap out. +1 for this whole concept, just BTW. As I've said before, I grow weary of asking customers to run gdb. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: