Re: REPACK and naming
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: REPACK and naming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZHpNPftfzn=9s-pmKwzEQDNB1Brit-GBY+GP2r=X+7Nw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: REPACK and naming (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: REPACK and naming
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > By and large, I don't think I like this renaming proposal. > Maybe eventually it would reduce confusion, but there will be > a long interval where it adds more. I mean, it's PRETTY confusing that VACUUM FULL does something much more similar to CLUSTER than it is to VACUUM. We can't ever get out from under that confusion if we don't change something. I think it's more than fair to bikeshed what the verb should be that describes the action we currently describe by writing either VACUUM FULL or CLUSTER, but I agree with Álvaro that having one verb for both of those things makes a lot more sense than the status quo. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: