Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZHfGucEUjPgFrzOEYg=O62F4T7Jc4qC0Lg5BpdVBhC6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: "long" type is not appropriate for counting tuples
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 5:31 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Another option is that in cases where it doesn't affect storage layouts, > like the counting tuples case that started this thread, code could just > use long long int directly instead of int64. Then if someone wants to > make it 128 bits or 96 bits or whatever it would not be a problem. I think that sort of thing tends not to work out well, because at some point it's likely to be sent out via the wire protocol; at that point we'll need a value of a certain width. Better to use that width right from the beginning. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: