[HACKERS] Re: Oddity in error handling of constraint violation inExecConstraints for partitioned tables

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:47:26PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/07/06 16:06, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> > Looks odd to me because the error message doesn't show any DETAIL info;
>> > since the CTE query, which produces the message, is the same as the above
>> > query, the message should also be the same as the one for the above
>> > query.
>>
>> I agree that the DETAIL should be shown.
>
>> The patch keeps tests that you added in your patch.  Added this to the
>> open items list.
>
> [Action required within three days.  This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.

The posted patches look OK to me.  Barring developments, I will commit
them on 2017-07-17, or send another update by then.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company