Re: plpgsql versus domains
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpgsql versus domains |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZG3BbhKUsT+U4MBwNp_UnYFO9sg+XsOBt7LSnKQYdFAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpgsql versus domains (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpgsql versus domains
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > To some extent this is a workaround for the fact that plpgsql does type > conversions the way it does (ie, by I/O rather than by using the parser's > cast mechanisms). We've talked about changing that, but people seem to > be afraid of the compatibility consequences, and I'm not planning to fight > two compatibility battles concurrently ;-) A sensible plan, but since we're here: - I do agree that changing the way PL/pgsql does those type conversions is scary. I can't predict what will break, and there's no getting around the scariness of that. - On the other hand, I do think it would be good to change it, because this sucks: rhaas=# do $$ declare x int; begin x := (3.0::numeric)/(1.0::numeric); end $$; ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "3.0000000000000000" CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 1 at assignment I didn't realize that this issue had even been discussed before... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: