Re: Small PATCH: check of 2 Perl modules
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Small PATCH: check of 2 Perl modules |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZFHnJ55NzhWXvDyVa3K4_O8h3dVopgCk+KX_H_8-e0-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Small PATCH: check of 2 Perl modules (Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:23:56 -0300 > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> ... but I agree with the point upthread that this should wait to see >> what happens with the CMake stuff, since this is not a newly >> introduced problem. > > I doubt, that CMake stuff would be ready for 9.6. There is just one > commitfest left, and it would be quite a radical change. > > And even if would appear in the next release, it cannot be easily > backpatched to 9.5. So we'll probably live with autoconf until the > end-of-life of 9.5 series at least. Yeah, I'm rather doubtful about anything happening with cmake any time soon. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: