On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:37 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > I don't see what your reference to checkpoint timeout is about here?
> >
> > Also, as I mentioned before, the problem isn't specific to checkpoint_timeout
> > = 1min. It just makes it cheaper to reproduce.
>
> That's flagrantly intellectually dishonest.
This kind of ad hominum attack has no place on this mailing list, or
anywhere in the PostgreSQL community.
If you think there's a problem with Andres's test case, or his
analysis of it, you can talk about those problems without accusing him
of intellectual dishonesty.
I don't see anything to indicate that he was being intentionally
dishonest, either. At most he was mistaken. More than likely, not even
that.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com