Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZBSt-8cDAQpT5tV6d9jfEW=VTOomvX+iHFLE2UFpwx8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> Other votes?  Other ideas?
>
> 5) test and set it in initdb.

Are you advocating for that option, or just calling out that it's
possible?  I'd say that's closely related to option #3, except at
initdb time rather than run-time - and it might be preferable to #3
for some of the same reasons discussed on the thread about tuning
work_mem, namely, that having it change from one postmaster lifetime
to the next might lead to user astonishment.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamic shared memory: wherein I am punished for good intentions