Re: Dynamic shared memory areas
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dynamic shared memory areas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZBLbbpthm-7dQReY-kwM2vLsxcT+z+V2n4AUBN41vpyg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dynamic shared memory areas (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dynamic shared memory areas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Munro >> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> Please find attached dsa-v8.patch, and also a small test module for >>> running random allocate/free exercises and dumping the internal >>> allocator state. >> >> OK, I've committed the main patch. > > ...but the buildfarm isn't very happy about it. > > tern complains: > > In file included from dsa.c:58:0: > ../../../../src/include/utils/dsa.h:59:1: error: unknown type name > 'pg_atomic_uint64' > typedef pg_atomic_uint64 dsa_pointer_atomic; > > ...but that code is only compiled if #if DSA_POINTER_SIZEOF == 4 fails > to be true. And that should always be true unless > PG_HAVE_ATOMIC_U64_SUPPORT is defined. So apparently tern claims to > PG_HAVE_ATOMIC_U64_SUPPORT but doesn't actually define > pg_atomic_uint64? That doesn't seem right. No, that's not the problem. Just a garden variety thinko in dsa.h. Will push a fix presently. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: