Re: Monitoring roles patch
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Monitoring roles patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZA-gM+Un0E65seyVT45axpaH8q-QRDs8L+nSUrynkSMA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Monitoring roles patch (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Monitoring roles patch
Re: Monitoring roles patch Re: Monitoring roles patch |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: >> I don't see any precedent in the code for having a hardcoded role, other than >> superuser, and allowing privileges based on a hardcoded test for membership >> in that role. I'm struggling to think of all the security implications of that. > > This would be the first. Isn't pg_signal_backend an existing precedent? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: