Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ9YEmy+dwybkLOBJbm2Hyc4yvr=c7p52oNK0SX6CDv9Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think the real challenge is going to be testing. If anyone has a >> machine with weak memory ordering they can give me access to, that >> would be really helpful for flushing the bugs out of this stuff. >> Getting it to work on x86 is not the hard part. > > I believe there's a PPC box in our storage facility in NJ that we > might be able to dig out for you. There's also a couple in our India > office. Let me know if they'd be of help. Yes! More processors is better, of course, but having anything at all to test on would be an improvement. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: