Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> But since that's an established design fl^H^Hprinciple, maybe that
> means we should go with the approach of teaching SerializeGUCState()
> to ignore role altogether and instead have ParallelWorkerMain call
> SetCurrentRoleId using information passed via the FixedParallelState
> (not sure of the precise details here).

Could I get some opinions on the virtues of this approach, vs. any of
the other suggestions at or near
http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaSP90E33-MU2YpGs73TtJ37m5Hv-xqHjc7TPqX9wX8ew@mail.gmail.com
?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company