Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ7cpTkKsFBun14QhAQ53H_Qi1_vxea=TAG34s=JnPc4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Broken defenses against dropping a partitioning column
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:02 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:32 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > That said, I'm not sure I see the use case for an ALTER TABLE .. DROP > > COLUMN command that turns a partitioned table (with existing partitions > > containing data) into one non-partitioned table with all data minus the > > partitioning column(s). > > I think it would be useful to have "ALTER TABLE blah NOT PARTITIONED" but I ...hit send too soon, and also, I don't think anyone will be very happy if they get that behavior as a side effect of a DROP statement, mostly because it could take an extremely long time to execute. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: