Re: [HACKERS] Size vs size_t

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Size vs size_t
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ7F-TeqqstK46+Q2ymgFHB1qx6N6BxRcLRSAw0ZbCjOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Size vs size_t  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Size vs size_t  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
> new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \<Size\> and
> \<size_t\> over time.  After a very long run in the lead, size_t has
> recently been left in the dust by Size.

I guess I assumed that we wouldn't have defined PG-specific types if
we wanted to just use the OS-supplied ones.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Corey Huinker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Re: new set of psql patches for loading (saving) data from (to)text, binary files