Re: Replication slots and footguns
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slots and footguns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ7DKH4jyRetvwoq_NbbjEfAeszeNkF7Z9cU6dA3sRtzg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slots and footguns (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication slots and footguns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2014-03-12 12:00:25 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: >> I was just reading Michael's explanation of replication slots >> (http://michael.otacoo.com/postgresql-2/postgres-9-4-feature-highlight-replication-slots/) >> and realized there was something which had completely escaped me in the >> pre-commit discussion: >> >> select pg_drop_replication_slot('slot_1'); >> ERROR: 55006: replication slot "slot_1" is already active >> LOCATION: ReplicationSlotAcquire, slot.c:339 >> >> What defines an "active" slot? > > One with a connected walsender. > >> It seems like there's no way for a DBA to drop slots from the master if >> it's rapidly running out of disk WAL space without doing a restart, and >> there's no way to drop the slot for a replica which the DBA knows is >> permanently offline but was connected earlier. Am I missing something? > > It's sufficient to terminate the walsender and then drop the slot. That > seems ok for now? Urgh. That error message looks susceptible to improvement. How about: replication slot "%s" cannot be dropped because it is currently in use -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: