Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ6n1zGe-yV1yL5FsaVvRwYdGRcPEVRCGe94sghBmULwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock in XLogInsert at AIX (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> If nobody is willing to put in the effort to keep AIX supported under >> XLC, then we should just update the documentation to say that it isn't >> supported. Our support for that platform is pretty marginal anyway if >> we're only supporting it up through 6.1; that was released in 2007 and >> went out of support in Q2 of last year. > > Huh? We have somebody just upthread saying that they're working out > issues on newer AIX. We should at least give them time to finish > that research before making any decisions. Well, I certainly have no problem with that in theory. That's why my sentence started with the word "if". On a practical level, this thread has been dead for almost a year, and has revived slightly because Michael bumped it, but nobody has really made a firm commitment to do any specific thing to move this issue forward. I'm happy if they do, but it might not happen. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: