Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] background sessions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ64384YKfpaMTAuawN4Ke3ZDHEC11widN=Y=usDemeow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] background sessions (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] background sessions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > For additional entertainment, I include patches that integrate > background sessions into dblink. So dblink can open a connection to a > background session, and then you can use the existing dblink functions > to send queries, read results, etc. People use dblink to make > self-connections to get autonomous subsessions, so this would directly > address that use case. The 0001 patch is some prerequisite refactoring > to remove an ugly macro mess, which is useful independent of this. 0002 > is the actual patch. Would that constitute a complete replacement for pg_background? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: