Re: Choosing parallel_degree
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ51FYTBGfbstbfMn0C7_jKpk1+ck27UX-pUwbCC3Kk8g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Choosing parallel_degree (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Re: Choosing parallel_degree |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote: > On 11/04/2016 22:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> On 11/04/2016 17:44, Robert Haas wrote: >>> We should probably add the number of workers actually obtained to the >>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. That's been requested before. >> >> If it's not too late for 9.6, it would be very great. > > Just in case I attach a patch to implement it. I'll add it to the next > commitfest. I think we should go with "Workers Planned" and "Workers Launched", capitalized exactly that way, and lose "Number Of". I would be inclined to view this as a reasonable 9.6 cleanup of parallel query, but other people may wish to construe things more strictly than I would. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: