Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ4BH+B+ABDthDEQTF2Mzb8N5sGOfLudxmcAe+hL8eV=Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? (ash <ash@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE?
Re: Re-create dependent views on ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN ... TYPE? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:22 AM, ash <ash@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> None of that involves answering hypothetical questions; but what you >> want to do does, and that I think is the problem in a nutshell. > > In a nutshell I'd like PostgreSQL to just re-parse the *current* view > definition. Should that throw an error, user intervention will be > required anyway, but most of the time it should just work. What exactly do you mean by "re-parse the current view definition"? The only form of the view definition we actually have is already parsed into an internal form (see pg_rewrite) which, for the reasons I've attempted to explain, is not easy to adapt to new column types. I suppose we could deparse that definition and then reparse the results, but that could lead to some very surprising consequences (some of which are security-relevant). -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: