Re: Function to track shmem reinit time
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function to track shmem reinit time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ3gk=mnKMi2SnpuO7SG7oaSXdDZjoeCiqZhuqDdF9NVg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Function to track shmem reinit time (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function to track shmem reinit time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:07 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: > On 3/29/18 9:40 AM, Tomas Vondra wrote: >> On 03/28/2018 08:55 PM, David Steele wrote: >>> I'm setting this entry to Waiting on Author, but based on the discussion >>> I think it should be Returned with Feedback. >> >> Fine with me. > > This entry has been marked Returned with Feedback. I guess I'm in the minority here, but I don't see why it isn't useful to have something like this. It's a lot easier for a monitoring process to poll for this kind of thing than it is to monitor the logs. Not that log monitoring isn't a good idea, but this is pretty lightweight. OTOH, it also seems like this could live as an out-of-core extension, so I guess if nobody else likes the idea Anastasia could always do it that way. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: