Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ0MZCL8A90+9rvLjrgtnq1ZJSquQ+-6EVf5mhT6e4m4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > It would make sense to have \password obey password_encryption GUC. Then > \password and ALTER USER would do the same thing, which would be less > surprising. Although it's also a bit weird for a GUC to affect client-side > behavior, so perhaps better to just document that \password will create a > SCRAM verifier, unless you explicitly tell it to create an MD5 hash, and add > a 'method' parameter to it. Either of those would be fine with me, but I think we should do one of them. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: