Re: MultiXact truncation, startup et al.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MultiXact truncation, startup et al. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ-i4FKCESesrdiUtO71ZPd0MjQCU17eGpWpZ8cSBz7tQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MultiXact truncation, startup et al. (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: MultiXact truncation, startup et al.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > So, I've done this for 9.3+ for now. Testing around that turned up that > our current way to schedule anti mxid wraparounds doesn't really work: > 1) autovacuum.c knows about such vacuums, but vacuum.c doesn't. Leading > to a long cycle of partial vacuums that don't increase relminmxid. > 2) Parts of the code used 200mio as a hardcoded constant, others used > autovacuum_freeze_max_age. > > 0001 fixes the vacuum scheduling and is applicable to 9.3+, multiTableLimit is a bad name for whatever concept this is supposed to represent. It does not involve multiple tables. vacuum_set_xid_limits now has multiXactCutoff, multiTableLimit, and mxLimit, and there's no explanation of what the are. > 0002 re-adds pg_multixact truncation during crash recovery. The current > code will only work on 9.3+, but if it's deemed acceptable I can > backport it to earlier versions. I am not sure if it's worth backporting > it 9.0 given it has neither HS nor SR? Huh? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: