Re: pgsql: Revoke PUBLIC CREATE from public schema, now owned by pg_databas
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Revoke PUBLIC CREATE from public schema, now owned by pg_databas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoZ+AFWhTPZnZSqDiuH5fCV6cF9df+fcJhmSoLqkBTiPEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Revoke PUBLIC CREATE from public schema, now owned by pg_databas (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Revoke PUBLIC CREATE from public schema, now owned by pg_databas
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:01 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:39:23AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 2:07 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > > > In general, the documentation should prefer simpler decision trees. > > > > True, but I found the current text confusing, which is also something > > to consider. > > Could remove the paragraph about v14. Could have that paragraph say > explicitly that the REVOKE is a no-op. Would either of those be an > improvement? Well, I thought what I proposed was a nice improvement, but I guess if you don't like it I'm not inclined to spend a lot of time discussing other possibilities. If we get some opinions from more people that may make it clearer which direction to go; if I'm the only one that doesn't like the way it is now, it's probably not that important. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: