Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYzHhc28h9KXyHr1=Q0hK3BKvACFZmmZ3CRX4O5TKnAHw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Hash partitioning will partition the data based on the hash value of the > partition key. Does that require collation? Should we throw an error/warning if > collation is specified in PARTITION BY clause? Collation is only relevant for ordering, not equality. Since hash opclasses provide only equality, not ordering, it's not relevant here. I'm not sure whether we should error out if it's specified or just silently ignore it. Maybe an ERROR is a good idea? But not sure. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: