Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYvbQsXE-740Qo-8bhQuSwME6WP7=qTGqW3DN+mtLVpvQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64 (Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add support for TAS/S_UNLOCK for aarch64
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 05:28:09 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> Hi, I was asked [1] to add following patch downstream, could it be >> considered upstream also? Thanks, Pavel. >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970661 > > Oh, I see now it was already consulted here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1368448758.23422.12.camel@t520.redhat.com > > Sorry for noise, it can be discussed there. I think we should go ahead and commit this patch, or some variant of it. Having a buildfarm machine would be good... but I don't think that should be a prerequisite for this sort of support. We certainly have spinlock support for other platforms for which we don't have buildfarm machines. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: