Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYudFd7XDyL6bV-XBG=nW+WJnb0W0fQXzjGBVsvSVWcFA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [WIP] Better partial index-only scans (Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Joshua Yanovski <pythonesque@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm glad you're looking at this, but we're in the final throws of >> nailing down 9.4 and I don't have anticipate I'll have time to look at >> it in the near future. You should add it here so we don't forget >> about it: >> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open > Yeah, no worries--you guys are busy enough as it is. As far as adding > it to the commitfest goes, I did, actually. Should I add the comment > with the testcase as well? I'm investigating further and it's looking > to me like what I'm really up against is O(n^2) behavior in the > optimizer for OR clauses, but I'll keep looking--don't want to say > anything too prematurely. >> >> And you might also check this: >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch >> > Also read that--did I do something wrong? I tried to make sure I > followed its guidelines. Anyway, thanks for the response :) No, I think you wrote a nice email, and I didn't think you did anything wrong. It was mostly just a form letter to say, hey, this looks interesting. Glad you were already aware of the resources. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: