Re: pgsql: Add new pg_walsummary tool.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:56 PM Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> Add new pg_walsummary tool.

culicidae is unhappy with this, but I don't yet understand why. The output is:

#   Failed test 'stdout shows block 0 modified'
#   at t/002_blocks.pl line 85.
#                   'TS 1663, DB 5, REL 16384, FORK main: blocks 0..1'
#     doesn't match '(?^m:FORK main: block 0$)'

The test is expecting block 0 to be modified, but block 1 to be
unmodified, but here, both blocks are modified. That would maybe make
sense if this machine had a really big block size, but that doesn't
seem to be the case. Or, maybe the test has erred in failing to
disable autovacuum -- though it does take other precautions to try to
prevent that from interfering.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com