Re: patch: bytea_agg
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: patch: bytea_agg |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYrxwd8Lv0Qj-6RK80gYzMRtOgy6mjwhUT4ELTGZ+4m0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: patch: bytea_agg (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: patch: bytea_agg
Re: patch: bytea_agg |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On ons, 2011-12-21 at 11:04 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> this patch adds a bytea_agg aggregation. >> >> It allow fast bytea concatetation. > > Why not call it string_agg? All the function names are the same between > text and bytea (e.g., ||, substr, position, length). It would be nice > not to introduce arbitrary differences. Well, because it doesn't operate on strings. I argued when we added string_agg that it ought to be called concat_agg, or something like that, but I got shouted down. So now here we are. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: