Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYreNVHDLYxH58Yew8SpYXppiJswJo=FEK0kBiNf06DHQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >> On 03/14/2017 11:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> In short, I don't think that argument refutes my position that "md5" >>> in pg_hba.conf should be understood as allowing SCRAM passwords too. >> >> >> Yeah, let's do that. Here's a patch. > > At least this has the merit of making \password simpler from psql > without a kind of --method option: if the backend is 9.6 or older, > just generate a MD5-hash, and SCRAM-hash for newer versions. > PQencryptPassword still needs to be extended so as it accepts a hash > method though. What if the user doesn't want to switch to SCRAM because they also use some connector that hasn't been updated to support it? I bet there will be a lot of people in that situation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: