Re: Patch (2): Implement failover on libpq connect level.
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch (2): Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYrCaHamM6fOYmkBqL5hJ9VXufevgXX4dBKaUfiQuASeg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch (2): Implement failover on libpq connect level. (Korry Douglas <korry.douglas@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch (2): Implement failover on libpq connect level.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Korry Douglas <korry.douglas@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > When you call pg_is_in_recovery(), you should schema-qualify the function > name, just in case some other version of that function exists in the > search_path. I wonder whether it's really a good idea to put this kind of logic into libpq at all. I think there was some previous votes against doing so, and I tend to agree with that viewpoint. Shouldn't probing for the state of the connection be the caller's job, not libpq's? If somebody wants to write a wrapper function around this that runs this query after connecting - or any other query - they can do so. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: