Re: Is this a bug?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is this a bug? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYpnSwjhfN2v9tskeBYWruV-G3pYrb4MDQSPmxPJtHm9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Is this a bug? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Is this a bug?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> Yes, you remember well. I will have to find a different way for >> pg_upgrade to call a no-op ALTER TABLE, which is fine. > > Looking at the ALTER TABLE options, I am going to put this check in a > !IsBinaryUpgrade block so pg_upgrade can still use its trick. -1, that's really ugly. Maybe the right solution is to add a form of ALTER TABLE that is specifically defined to do only this check. This is an ongoing need, so that might not be out of line. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: