Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why do we need two snapshots per query? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYpRvPoKw_WffUQCjugU+a_g7GVPaLSBxUb9xyMTxmVyQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why do we need two snapshots per query? (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: why do we need two snapshots per query?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: >> + /* Done with the snapshot used for parameter I/O and parsing/planning */ >> + if (snapshot_set) >> + PopActiveSnapshot(); > > This comment needs adjusting. I thought about adjusting it, but I didn't see what it made sense to adjust it to. It still is the parameter used for parameter I/O and parsing/planning, so the existing text isn't wrong. It will possibly also get reused for execution, but the previous statement has a lengthy comment on that, so it didn't seem worth recapitulating here. > You need to be editing the comments for this function. To be specific > you didn't update this text: > > * The caller can optionally pass a snapshot to be used; pass InvalidSnapshot > * for the normal behavior of setting a new snapshot. This parameter is > * presently ignored for non-PORTAL_ONE_SELECT portals (it's only intended > * to be used for cursors). Actually, I did, but the change was in the second patch file attached to the same email, which maybe you missed? Combined patch attached. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: